See Scoop in action
Bring your data to life with AI-powered presentations—start your free trial of Scoop.
The only AI that does real data science. It finds patterns, segments, and predictors in your data — Try it now →
.jpg)
Delivering large-scale road and highway infrastructure projects requires seamless oversight of budgets, timelines, and risk—yet legacy business intelligence often leaves decision-makers with fragmented visibility. When a leading transportation operations team sought clarity on its annual allocation of over 300 projects, it turned to Scoop to cut through complexity. This case offers essential lessons for infrastructure leads everywhere managing multimillion investments, proving how AI-powered agentic analysis can uncover optimization opportunities missed by conventional analytics.
Through Scoop’s agentic AI pipeline, the infrastructure operations team achieved a level of clarity unattainable through legacy analysis. The findings enabled leadership to immediately pinpoint where budget efficiency broke down, to understand how risk and resource allocation mapped across the network, and to plan both tactical and strategic interventions. Detailed modeling showed, for example, that over 80% of projects were classified as medium risk and that almost all extended-duration initiatives (over 521 days) correlated with low resource utilization efficiency. These insights are informing a realignment of budgeting strategy and contract oversight to drive greater value from public spend.
The upcoming year’s infrastructure program is allocated this sum in local currency, signaling a substantial commitment to national roadways.
Average initiative length (days), with 81.7% of projects extending beyond half a year—highlighting the system’s emphasis on complex, ongoing improvements.
Average initiative length (days), with 81.7% of projects extending beyond half a year—highlighting the system’s emphasis on complex, ongoing improvements.
Virtually all projects over 521 days showed low budget efficiency, directly flagged by the AI as an area for corrective action.
Asphalt/Paving and 'Other' projects account for the vast bulk of spend, guiding resource reallocation reviews.
Managing road and highway maintenance at scale involves orchestrating hundreds of simultaneous initiatives, each with unique risk, budget, and execution challenges. Traditional reporting tools often fall short in providing a unified, actionable view of cross-project performance, especially in environments with multi-region deployment, evolving risk, and rigid budget constraints. In this case, the core dataset featured over 300 road infrastructure improvement projects spanning signaling, safety, drainage, and structural works, each tagged by location, duration, priority, and budget allocation for 2025. Critical business questions included: Which activities or regions are draining resources inefficiently? Where does risk cluster, and is it inherently tied to geography or funding? Previous business intelligence lacked the ability to cut through the noise and surface root causes, rapid trends, or policy-driven patterns—resulting in potential missed optimizations and suboptimal allocation of capital and project resources.
The dataset analyzed included detailed records for 329 transportation infrastructure projects planned for the upcoming year, spanning road segments, activity types (such as asphalt paving, signaling, drainage, and structural maintenance), with each entry annotated by contractor assignment (work front), fiscal breakdowns by month, risk assessments, and precise project timelines. The dataset covered a single fiscal year, included a variety of regional markers, and contained both quantitative (budgets, days, counts) and categorical (priority, region, activity) fields.
Key steps in Scoop’s agentic AI workflow:
The dataset analyzed included detailed records for 329 transportation infrastructure projects planned for the upcoming year, spanning road segments, activity types (such as asphalt paving, signaling, drainage, and structural maintenance), with each entry annotated by contractor assignment (work front), fiscal breakdowns by month, risk assessments, and precise project timelines. The dataset covered a single fiscal year, included a variety of regional markers, and contained both quantitative (budgets, days, counts) and categorical (priority, region, activity) fields.
Key steps in Scoop’s agentic AI workflow:
Scoop’s automated modeling uncovered several non-obvious, high-impact operational patterns. First, the system found that project duration was the strongest single predictor of budget inefficiency. Almost every project stretching past 521 days resulted in systematically low efficiency, regardless of priority or location—a threshold missed by conventional reporting, which treats project overruns as isolated. Furthermore, the rigid, rule-based budgeting framework: every project’s budget allocation mapped exactly to its priority level, with zero exceptions. This approach, while defensible for compliance and simplicity, ignores nuanced project complexity or regional cost variations—an inflexibility not typically flagged by standard dashboards.
Another insight: risk was less about headline project size and more closely tied to whether a project was assigned a budget at all. Structural and 'other' projects lacking clear funding were instantly categorized as high risk, a pattern validated at 100% accuracy by Scoop’s interpretable ML rules. Also, midrange projects in the North consistently bore higher risk than similar initiatives in other regions, providing quantifiable evidence of environmental or logistical headwinds. Finally, signaling and safety projects, irrespective of their budget or urgency, always followed standardized durations, demonstrating ingrained organizational methodologies. Such insights—tying detailed operational levers to big-picture outcomes—would not be accessible via ad-hoc queries or visuals alone.
Armed with these AI-driven insights, the operations team is prioritizing a granular review of long-duration projects, especially those exceeding the 521-day threshold, to identify process bottlenecks and address underlying drivers of inefficiency. Contract oversight structures are being realigned to encourage higher efficiency among internal work fronts and to replicate successful practices observed in subcontracted teams. Risk classification models now inform pre-allocation screening—ensuring that projects without confirmed budgets are escalated for management intervention before execution. Follow-up analysis is planned for regional disparities, especially in the North, to adjust resource planning and tailor risk controls. Immediate actions include updating budgeting protocols to introduce a more nuanced framework that reflects project complexity, geographic cost, and historical delivery patterns.