How Three Years of Solving Real Analytics Problems Led Us to the Same Principles MIT and IBM Are Now Researching
By Brad Peters, CEO & Founder, Scoop Analytics
A few months ago, I'm reading research papers from MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab on something called "neuro-symbolic AI." The basic idea: AI systems that combine pattern learning with logical reasoning. Neural approaches for finding patterns, symbolic logic for explainable decisions.
And I'm thinking... holy shit, that's what we built with Scoop.
Not exactly the same—they're doing fundamental research with Logic Tensor Networks and neural theorem proving. We're building production software that runs on standard infrastructure.
But we're solving the same core problem: How do you get ML that's both accurate AND explainable?
Here's what happened.
The Problem We've Been Solving
I spent decades building analytics at Siebel and Birst. Same problem every time: ML models that were accurate but unusable.
Not because the math was wrong. Because when someone asks "why is this customer flagged?" and you answer with feature importance scores and correlation coefficients, they tune out.
The forced choice: Accurate ML you can't explain, or simple rules you can explain but miss half the patterns.
Business users consistently pick explainability over accuracy. An 80% accurate model they understand beats a 95% accurate black box. Because unexplainable predictions don't get acted on.
What We Built (And Why)
When we built Scoop, we made specific choices:
Use interpretable algorithms:
J48 decision trees that can be 800 nodes deep but still show explicit logic. JRip rule learners that generate IF-THEN rules with statistical validation. K-means clustering that explains what defines each segment.
These aren't simple. They're sophisticated ML from the Weka library—used in academic research and enterprise data science. But they're explainable by design. Every prediction traces through logic you can audit.
Show statistical rigor:
P-values, confidence levels, sample sizes. Not just "the algorithm thinks this"—actual statistical validation translated into business language.
Use LLMs for translation, not prediction:
This is critical. We don't use AI to analyze the data. We use traditional ML algorithms that are mathematically sound, then use LLMs to translate the 800-node decision tree into plain English.
The AI explains real analysis. It doesn't make it up.
Why this worked:
We've deployed this at scale—1,279 locations analyzed simultaneously, 156 million rows processed, 98.3% query success rate. Customers tell us they finally have ML they can explain to their CFO and act on confidently.
Then We Found the Research
That's when I started reading about neuro-symbolic AI coming out of MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab, DeepMind, and other institutions.
The research community is tackling the exact problem we saw: AI systems need both accurate pattern recognition AND logical, explainable reasoning.
DeepMind's AlphaGeometry just solved 25 of 30 International Math Olympiad geometry problems by combining neural pattern recognition with symbolic logical reasoning. IBM is building neuro-symbolic capabilities into enterprise products. It's being called "the 3rd wave" of AI.
We didn't follow their research. We followed customer pain. But we ended up with the same core principles:
- Combine learning with reasoning
- Make the logic transparent
- Keep humans in control
The honest gap: We're not building what academic researchers are building. They're doing fundamental work on tightly integrated neural-symbolic architectures. We're building production software that deploys in days.
But we're solving the same problem with aligned principles. Research describes a spectrum from loosely to tightly coupled systems. We're toward the looser end—using interpretable ML algorithms combined with natural language translation. It's production-ready and scalable.
The validation matters because it confirms this isn't just clever engineering. There's real computer science showing why this approach works.
Why This Matters Now
Regulation is here:
The EU AI Act (effective 2025) requires explainability for high-risk AI systems. If you can't explain how your AI made a decision, you can't legally use it in many contexts.
Adoption drives ROI:
The biggest predictor of ML success isn't accuracy—it's whether people use it. Explainable systems have higher adoption because users trust what they can understand and verify.
Competitive reality:
Most vendors are adding LLMs for natural language queries. That's useful for lookups. But when the LLM hallucinates or can't explain why something changed, you're stuck with no way to verify.
Using LLMs to translate verified ML results is fundamentally different from using LLMs to do the analysis. One is reliable. One sounds convincing but may not be accurate.
What This Looks Like in Practice
When Scoop analyzes your data, you get:
Transparent reasoning:
"High-risk customers identified by three factors: Support tickets exceeding threshold, engagement drop pattern, timing relative to renewal. Statistical significance: p < 0.001."
Natural language without hallucination:
Because LLMs translate (not predict), you get plain English explanations of real analysis. The AI isn't making up correlations—it's explaining what the ML algorithms actually found.
Production-proven scale:
1,279 locations, 196 data columns, 90.4% accuracy on validation scenarios. This runs in production today.
Conclusion
We built Scoop to solve a problem I'd seen for decades: ML that was too sophisticated to trust.
Then we discovered researchers at MIT, IBM, and DeepMind arriving at similar conclusions from a theoretical direction. Systems need to combine learning with logical reasoning. Accuracy with explainability.
That validation confirms we're solving a fundamental problem the right way. The principles that make Scoop useful today—interpretable algorithms, statistical transparency, logical reasoning chains—align with what researchers are validating for trustworthy AI tomorrow.
The science validates the direction. Your data will validate the results.
See interpretable AI in action: Start free trial or request a demo
