Domain Intelligence

AI is powerful.
Without context, it's blind.

The investigation layer that encodes your best operators' judgment and runs it across every location, automatically. It knows which patterns matter — and which are noise.

1,200+Locations
700+Probes / run
WeeksNot months
The Problem

Every business has that one person who just knows.

We sat in a room with a COO and his best operators at a national retail chain. We watched them look at dashboards and argue about what the numbers meant. One person would see a spike in inventory and shrug — normal seasonality. Another would see the same spike and say "that store is about to crater in six months."

Same data. Completely different conclusions.

The difference was context. Twenty years of pattern recognition that wasn't in any dashboard. We needed to capture that — and make it run at scale.

"There's one person in our organization who can look at these reports and see what's going to happen in six months. We have 1,200 locations. He can't get to all of them. We're trying to scale that person."
— COO, 1,200-location retail chain
Why This Is Different

Everyone has AI. Nobody has context.

Power BI Copilot and Snowflake Cortex can answer the questions you ask. Domain Intelligence decides which questions to ask, runs the investigation autonomously, and delivers the findings — like your best analyst would.

Generic AI

Answers the question you asked.

Doesn't know if it's the right question. No business context. No governed investigation.

Dashboards & BI

Shows what happened.

Humans still interpret and investigate. Can't explain why. Can't prioritize what matters.

Domain Intelligence

Knows what to look for. Investigates autonomously.

Prescribes what to do and why — like your best person would. Repeatable, governed, trustable.

See the Output

Here's what the AI actually delivers.

No human wrote this. The system screened every location, investigated the flagged ones, and generated a finished report — fully automated.

What happens when a location gets flagged

The AI runs 15+ probes, then decides whether to dig deeper. Each investigation tree adapts based on what it finds — the same way your best analyst actually thinks.

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#FEF3F7', 'primaryTextColor': '#130417', 'primaryBorderColor': '#E3165B', 'lineColor': '#D1D5DB', 'fontSize': '15px', 'fontFamily': 'Inter, sans-serif'}, 'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 40, 'rankSpacing': 60, 'curve': 'basis'}}}%%
flowchart TD
    DSD["🔍 Deep Diagnosis
15+ targeted probes"] DSD --> G1["Revenue & Pricing
Trends"] DSD --> G2["Customer &
Segment Analysis"] DSD --> G3["Category &
Operational Data"] DSD --> ML["🧠 ML Root Cause
Finds the #1 driver
humans miss"] G1 & G2 & G3 & ML --> SYNTH["📋 AI Synthesizes
Root cause + action items"] DSD -->|"AI decides: need deeper look"| FU["Follow-up Investigation
3 targeted probes"] FU --> SYNTH style DSD fill:#FEF3F7,color:#130417,stroke:#E3165B,stroke-width:2px style G1 fill:#fff,color:#130417,stroke:#E5E7EB style G2 fill:#fff,color:#130417,stroke:#E5E7EB style G3 fill:#fff,color:#130417,stroke:#E5E7EB style ML fill:#FEF3F7,color:#130417,stroke:#E3165B,stroke-width:2px style FU fill:#F3F4F6,color:#130417,stroke:#D1D5DB style SYNTH fill:#FEF3F7,color:#130417,stroke:#E3165B,stroke-width:2px
Sample Report Output
1Executive Summary

Top-line findings with data — what's happening and where

2Key Findings

Per-location diagnosis — what the AI found when it dug in

3Discovery Path

How the AI traced a problem from symptom to root cause

4Action Items

Specific, data-referenced recommendations

5Methodology

Exactly how the AI reached each conclusion

Automated Investigation
Location Performance Report
3 locations flagged · 24-month baseline

Executive Summary

Three locations exhibit operational distress — costs growing 12–18% while same-store revenue declines up to 9%. Customer acquisition has diverged sharply across locations.

Critical: All three show costs outpacing revenue — capital is getting locked in operations that aren't converting. Location B is most concerning: traffic barely growing while revenue declined 9%.

LocationTrafficRevenueCosts
Location A+8%-4%+12%
Location B+3%-9%+15%
Location C+10%-2%+18%

Key Findings

Systematic cost overrun: All locations show costs growing 12–18% while revenue declines, indicating an operational efficiency problem across the group.

Location A: Volatile traffic (3K–15K monthly), improving conversion (65%→80%), but losing mid-tier repeat customers (Silver -20%, Gold -24%).

Location B: Conversion crisis — rate dropped from 38% to 26%. Highest-value customers down 18%.

Location C: Returns surging across categories — up 178% in one segment, 485% in another — despite strong average transaction values.

Location B — Discovery Path

After 22 consecutive months of growth (17–70% YoY), same-store revenue turned negative for the first time.

Conversion rate dropped from 38% baseline to 26% — fewer visitors are converting despite stable traffic.

Customer segmentation identified the source: highest-value tier down 18%, entry-level tier down 75%. Total customer spending declined from $322K to $282K.

Category analysis showed the primary segment declining 18% YoY while secondary segments held — suggesting targeted rather than systemic issues.

Recommended Actions

  • Location B conversion audit — conversion dropped from 38% to 26%; investigate pricing, merchandising, and competitive pressure
  • Customer retention program — mid-tier repeat customers churning at Location A despite improving conversion; segment analysis needed
  • Returns investigation at Location C — 178–485% increases suggest quality, sizing, or expectation mismatch
  • Cost structure review — all three locations show costs outpacing revenue; identify which categories are driving divergence

Investigation Methodology

1. Universal Screening — All locations screened against revenue trends, cost ratios, conversion rates, and customer metrics.

2. Threshold Flagging — Locations flagged where costs outpace revenue, conversion declined >15%, or segments shifted >20%.

3. Multi-Dimensional Diagnostic — 24-month analysis across traffic, segmentation, category performance, and operations.

4. Pattern Recognition — Inflection points, leading indicators, and peer comparisons identified.

5. Insight Synthesis — Actionable findings, open questions, and risk prioritization delivered as executive narratives.

Under the Hood

Not a dashboard. Not a chatbot.
A governed investigation engine.

Six stages — from raw data to executive reports. AI doing real work in a structure that's trustable, on trustable metrics.

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': {'primaryColor': '#FEF3F7', 'primaryTextColor': '#130417', 'primaryBorderColor': '#E3165B', 'lineColor': '#D1D5DB', 'fontSize': '14px', 'fontFamily': 'Inter, sans-serif'}, 'flowchart': {'nodeSpacing': 30, 'rankSpacing': 60, 'curve': 'basis'}}}%%
flowchart LR
    A["📍 Your\nLocations"] --> B["SCREEN
Multiple lenses\nin parallel"] B -->|"Flagged"| C["INVESTIGATE
Deep diagnosis
15+ probes + ML"] B -->|"Passed"| D["SAFETY NET
Health checks
AI escalates if needed"] C --> E["SYNTHESIZE
AI writes narratives
Root cause + actions"] D --> E E --> F["ROLL UP
Location → District
→ Region → Exec"] F --> G["📊 REPORTS
Client-ready
at every level"] style A fill:#F8F9FA,color:#130417,stroke:#D1D5DB style B fill:#FEF3F7,color:#130417,stroke:#E3165B,stroke-width:2px style C fill:#FEF3F7,color:#130417,stroke:#E3165B,stroke-width:2px style D fill:#fff,color:#130417,stroke:#D1D5DB style E fill:#FEF3F7,color:#130417,stroke:#E3165B,stroke-width:2px style F fill:#fff,color:#130417,stroke:#D1D5DB style G fill:#FEF3F7,color:#130417,stroke:#E3165B,stroke-width:2px
Every location gets analysis. Flagged locations get deep diagnosis. Nothing falls through the cracks. Same rigor, every cycle.
Where It Fits

Sits on top of your stack —
not instead of it.

Domain Intelligence adds an investigation layer that makes everything you've already built more useful.

Domain Intelligence
Enterprise process workflow · Business context · Investigation orchestration
Scoop
AI Query Layer
Natural language to SQL · Semantic search · Chat
Power BI Copilot Snowflake Cortex Tableau Pulse
BI & Visualization
Dashboards · Reports · Ad-hoc analysis
Power BI Tableau Looker
Data Infrastructure
Storage · Transformation · Governance
Snowflake Databricks BigQuery

The insight: Copilot and Cortex are AI wrappers for your data. Scoop is an expert system that orchestrates analysis the way your best analysts would — automatically, at scale.

Getting Started

We've figured out 95% of it.
Let us do the last mile with you.

The AI doesn't learn your business on its own. Your people teach it — through us.

1
Capture

We sit with your best people and learn how they think — what they look for, what triggers concern, what they'd recommend.

2
Encode

We turn that into structured investigation contexts — screening lenses, diagnostic probes, pattern rules.

3
Validate

We run it on your real data. Your team reviews. "I didn't see that" is the best feedback we can get.

4
Scale

Once tuned, it runs autonomously — every location, every cycle. Your people review findings and act.

"We don't come in claiming to know your business. We come in knowing how to learn it — fast."

— Brad Peters, Founder & CEO

See what your data already knows.

A conversation with your operators. A pilot on real data. First reports in weeks — not months.

AI is powerful. Without context, it's blind. Let's give it yours.