See Scoop in action
Bring your data to life with AI-powered presentations—start your free trial of Scoop.
The only AI that does real data science. It finds patterns, segments, and predictors in your data — Try it now →
.jpg)
In today’s volatile markets, effective portfolio management demands more than just traditional performance tracking—it requires rapid, intelligent insights into risk allocation and concentration. This case study highlights how an asset management team leveraged Scoop’s AI-powered pipeline to transform fragmented trading position data into clear, actionable strategy. By automating the end-to-end analytics process, Scoop provided deep visibility into position sizing, exposure, and concentration—delivering strategic value when it mattered most. As investment teams seek to balance opportunity with risk, agentic analysis offers a path to greater control, clarity, and resilience.
With Scoop’s automated analytics, the team gained a rapid, granular view of capital deployment, risk concentration, and position categorization—insights that would have taken days or weeks to manually assemble. The analysis revealed a high degree of concentration risk (with over two-thirds of the portfolio in just two positions), a long-only exposure bias, and strict, yet sometimes incomplete, classification thresholds governing position size and risk assignment. Armed with both precise metrics and the agentic discovery of rule exceptions and structural gaps, the team could address compliance, rebalance more confidently, and put in place enhanced risk controls. Importantly, the clarity around both category boundaries and exceptions empowered decision-makers to assess whether current allocation policies adequately protected the portfolio as conditions shift.
Represents 100% of tracked capital in local currency; nearly all capital was actively allocated.
One holding accounted for approximately 38% of the entire portfolio, indicating material concentration risk.
One holding accounted for approximately 38% of the entire portfolio, indicating material concentration risk.
Reflects concentrated exposure, as only four active long positions were held at substantial average size.
Substantial capital was deployed in each active holding, pointing to a bias for large, non-diversified allocations.
Diversified investment portfolios regularly confront a core challenge: maintaining optimal risk exposure while maximizing returns. In the absence of dynamic, real-time analysis, portfolio managers must manually assess concentration risk, asset distribution, and compliance with internal limits. Legacy BI tools often lack the ability to rapidly classify position categories, detect threshold-driven exposures, or highlight latent directional biases—all of which are essential for timely risk mitigation. This team, operating with a mix of active and inactive long-only positions, faced uncertainty over the true distribution of capital, the underlying thresholds driving position classifications, and whether the portfolio’s structural biases left it exposed to unanticipated risks. Without automated analytics, these challenges translated into potential gaps in compliance, risk oversight, and capital deployment efficiency.
Automated Dataset Scanning & Metadata Inference: Scoop instantly detected the presence of key fields—absolute position values, percentage allocations, and categorical variables—eliminating hours of manual data prep and validation. This step directly highlighted the long-only bias and the sharp contrast between active and inactive positions.
.jpg)
Scoop’s ML-driven review surfaced patterns that elude manual spreadsheet checks or conventional dashboards. The system clarified that position categorization was governed by exact, but previously undocumented, numerical thresholds: positions above $211,562.50 were always "Large," while under $73,050 classified as "Medium"—with a substantial gap in position allocation strategy between those levels. Portfolio weights fell into sharply bounded groups, with a dividing threshold at 3.39% crucial to risk assignment; yet a gap existed between 3.39% and 5.46% where no category was applied, exposing potential blind spots. Machine learning exposed the binary nature of position sizing—there were no above-average positions, only zero or below-average exposures—highlighting a deeply conservative, risk-controlled mandate. Importantly, attempts to build predictive models on "Average Dollar per Percent" failed due to insufficient explanatory variables, shining a light on latent complexity and the need for additional data dimensions. These subtleties—rule exceptions, unclassified bands, and binary sizing logic—are precisely the issues that traditional static BI cannot surface without substantial data science effort.
The team used Scoop’s insights to address concentration risk by earmarking review of the two dominant positions for potential rebalancing. In parallel, newly exposed gaps in category coverage (between threshold bands) prompted planned revisions of internal classification policies, moving from rigid rule sets to more flexible, data-driven assignment. The explicit identification of a long-only stance led operational risk to confirm policy intent and the absence of synthetic or short exposures. Looking forward, the team plans to augment its dataset with more granular exposure attributes and alternative investment types, aiming to unlock predictive modeling for nuanced portfolio metrics—such as the elusive "Average Dollar per Percent." Scoop’s pipeline will be leveraged in ongoing portfolio reviews to automate both structural monitoring and iterative threshold refinement.