See Scoop in action
Bring your data to life with AI-powered presentations—start your free trial of Scoop.
The only AI that does real data science. It finds patterns, segments, and predictors in your data — Try it now →
.jpg)
Software development and IT teams depend on prompt issue resolution to maintain quality, velocity, and stakeholder trust. Yet as organizations scale and teams juggle competing priorities, backlogs expand, and hidden inefficiencies can quietly erode throughput. This case study highlights how AI-powered, end-to-end analysis surfaces actionable insights—pinpointing process lapses, seasonal patterns, and individual workflow strengths and gaps. For leaders, it demonstrates how AI can illuminate what traditional dashboards overlook, driving better resource allocation and measurable gains in operational performance.
With minimal manual input, Scoop’s agentic pipeline exposed the drivers underlying issue resolution efficiency and backlog expansion. Leaders learned that while headline metrics appeared healthy—66% of all issues resolved—serious hidden aging and process inconsistencies existed. Rapid cycles were achievable: over 30% of issues were resolved within three days, but others aged beyond 160 days often due to a few specific reporting and assignment patterns. Scoop's targeted analytics equipped stakeholders to proactively tackle root causes, redistribute workloads, and refine issue documentation standards for broader operational improvement.
Two-thirds of issues (162 out of 244) reached resolution, a strong headline rate, but this masked process bottlenecks behind the unresolved backlog.
In January 2025, new issue creation outpaced resolution by more than double, spurring a surge in unresolved tickets and signaling the need for urgent intervention.
In January 2025, new issue creation outpaced resolution by more than double, spurring a surge in unresolved tickets and signaling the need for urgent intervention.
14 % of all issues were resolved on the same day, underscoring the team’s latent efficiency when process flows and assignments aligned.
One assignee accounted for the bulk of issues lacking sufficient documentation, correlating directly with longer average resolution times.
Modern software organizations rely on robust issue tracking to coordinate cross-functional efforts, capture bugs, and manage feature work across distributed teams. As the ticket volume swells, maintaining a healthy backlog and fast resolution becomes a persistent challenge. The dataset under review—an export from an issue tracking platform—exposes key pain points: uneven workload distribution, aging unresolved issues, and process bottlenecks masked by overall healthy resolution rates. Traditional BI tools and static dashboards often miss latent factors that deteriorate team responsiveness, such as the interplay of assignment patterns, report quality, timing, and inter-team collaboration. Without a granular, adaptive analytic approach, teams risk slow drift toward unmanageable backlogs, inconsistent SLAs, and missed delivery targets.
Dataset Scanning & Metadata Inference: Scoop automatically profiled the dataset for completeness, identifying 244 distinct issues and inferring structural relationships critical to further analysis. This ensured all relevant columns—especially temporal and responsibility fields—were interpreted accurately, even as many optional fields were empty.
.jpg)
Scoop’s agentic ML models unearthed high-impact, non-obvious patterns that elude conventional reporting. For example, the model surfaced that January 2025 was uniquely problematic: 70 % of issues created then remained unresolved, while in December 2024, nearly three-quarters were promptly resolved. Rather than generic workload statistics, the ML linked resolution risk tightly to specific team dynamics—certain reporter-assignee pairs predicted persistent backlog, whereas others consistently delivered immediate resolution. Description length emerged as a hidden lever: tickets with detailed fields over 330 characters typically languished for weeks, while concise submissions yielded swifter closure. Furthermore, temporal rhythms (e.g., Monday volume spikes, Friday slowdowns) were mapped to individual assignment patterns, revealing how scheduling and planning cycles impact throughput. These findings, built not from surface-level aggregates but from adaptive, explainable models, delivered both predictive power and trust—making it clear which precise factors to address for maximum impact.
Armed with Scoop’s synthesized insights, the engineering management team intervened in three key areas: they redistributed assignments to relieve top contributors handling the most aging tickets, trained staff on concise but informative ticket documentation, and set new follow-up protocols during peak backlog periods. The analytics also provided an evidence base to evaluate resourcing around high-pressure months, ensuring future cycles won’t repeat bottlenecks. Next steps include integrating more granular workflow metadata into future analyses and using Scoop to automate continuous monitoring—building a proactive issue management process that keeps teams ahead of backlog growth and delivery risks.