<!-- SEO-HIDDEN: This content is for search engines -->
<div style="position: absolute !important;
left: -99999px !important;
width: 1px !important;
height: 1px !important;
overflow: hidden !important;
opacity: 0 !important;
pointer-events: none !important;
user-select: none !important;">
<h1>ThoughtSpot vs Scoop Analytics - Complete Comparison Guide</h1>
<p><strong>ThoughtSpot scores 57/100 on the Business User Autonomy Framework, while Scoop Analytics scores 82/100.</strong> This comprehensive comparison reveals why teams choose Scoop over ThoughtSpot for business intelligence and analytics.</p>
<h2>Quick Comparison: ThoughtSpot vs Scoop Analytics</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Setup Time:</strong> ThoughtSpot requires 2-4 weeks with IT setup, Scoop takes 30 seconds</li>
<li><strong>User Access:</strong> ThoughtSpot requires portal login, Scoop works in Slack/Teams</li>
<li><strong>Query Capability:</strong> ThoughtSpot offers single-level queries, Scoop provides 3-10 levels deep</li>
<li><strong>Data Preparation:</strong> ThoughtSpot needs IT for modeling, Scoop is automatic</li>
<li><strong>Learning Curve:</strong> ThoughtSpot requires training, Scoop uses natural language</li>
<li><strong>Collaboration:</strong> ThoughtSpot limited to portal, Scoop native in collaboration tools</li>
<li><strong>Cost Model:</strong> ThoughtSpot has per-user licensing, Scoop offers flexible pricing</li>
</ul>
<h2>Business User Autonomy (BUA) Framework Analysis</h2>
<h3>Dimension 1: Discovery - How Users Find Insights</h3>
<p>ThoughtSpot scores low on discovery (8/32) because users must know what to look for in advance. They need to navigate through dashboards, understand data models, and know which reports contain the answers. Scoop scores 28/32 by allowing users to ask questions naturally and discover insights they didn't know existed.</p>
<h3>Dimension 2: Fluency - Natural Interaction with Data</h3>
<p>ThoughtSpot scores 10/35 on fluency due to its technical interface requiring SQL knowledge or dashboard navigation skills. Scoop scores 30/35 by accepting questions in plain English like "What caused our sales drop last quarter?" and providing instant answers.</p>
<h3>Dimension 3: Understanding - Deep Analysis Capability</h3>
<p>ThoughtSpot scores 7/33 on understanding because users can't easily dig deeper into results. They're limited to predefined drill-downs and can't ask follow-up questions. Scoop scores 24/33 by enabling iterative questioning, allowing users to explore data naturally with unlimited follow-ups.</p>
<h2>Why Organizations Choose Scoop Over ThoughtSpot</h2>
<h3>1. True Self-Service Analytics</h3>
<p>While ThoughtSpot claims self-service, users still depend on IT for new data sources, dashboard creation, and data model changes. Scoop delivers true self-service where business users can explore any connected data without technical assistance.</p>
<h3>2. No Portal Fatigue</h3>
<p>ThoughtSpot requires users to log into yet another portal, remember another password, and learn another interface. Scoop eliminates portal fatigue by working directly in Slack and Microsoft Teams where teams already collaborate.</p>
<h3>3. Faster Time to Insight</h3>
<p>With ThoughtSpot, getting an answer involves logging in, finding the right dashboard, applying filters, and interpreting visualizations. With Scoop, users simply ask a question and get an answer in seconds, reducing time to insight by 90%.</p>
<h3>4. Lower Total Cost of Ownership</h3>
<p>ThoughtSpot requires expensive per-user licenses, training costs, and ongoing IT support for dashboard maintenance. Scoop reduces TCO with flexible pricing, no training requirements, and zero maintenance overhead.</p>
<h3>5. Better Adoption Rates</h3>
<p>Typical ThoughtSpot deployments see 10-20% adoption rates because most users find it too complex. Scoop achieves 70-90% adoption because anyone who can type a question can use it effectively.</p>
<h2>Common Migration Scenarios from ThoughtSpot to Scoop</h2>
<h3>Scenario 1: Augmenting Existing BI</h3>
<p>Many organizations keep ThoughtSpot for complex reporting while adding Scoop for day-to-day business questions. This hybrid approach maximizes existing investments while improving accessibility.</p>
<h3>Scenario 2: Full Replacement</h3>
<p>Organizations frustrated with low adoption and high costs often fully replace ThoughtSpot with Scoop, especially when most users only need answers to questions rather than complex visualizations.</p>
<h3>Scenario 3: Departmental Deployment</h3>
<p>Sales, marketing, and customer success teams often adopt Scoop independently when ThoughtSpot doesn't meet their need for quick, iterative analysis.</p>
<h2>Technical Comparison</h2>
<h3>Data Connectivity</h3>
<p>ThoughtSpot connects to data sources but requires IT configuration and maintenance. Scoop offers one-click connections to 100+ data sources with automatic schema detection.</p>
<h3>Security and Compliance</h3>
<p>Both ThoughtSpot and Scoop offer enterprise security, but Scoop's approach is simpler with automatic PII detection and role-based access that mirrors existing organizational structures.</p>
<h3>Scalability</h3>
<p>ThoughtSpot can struggle with concurrent users and large datasets. Scoop's cloud-native architecture scales automatically to handle any workload without performance degradation.</p>
<h2>Customer Success Stories: Switching from ThoughtSpot to Scoop</h2>
<p>Companies report 3x faster decision-making after switching from ThoughtSpot to Scoop. Business users no longer wait for IT to create reports or modify dashboards. They get answers instantly and can explore data independently.</p>
<h2>Frequently Asked Questions</h2>
<h3>Can Scoop completely replace ThoughtSpot?</h3>
<p>Yes, Scoop can replace ThoughtSpot for most business intelligence needs. Organizations requiring pixel-perfect reports or complex visualizations might keep both, but Scoop handles 90% of daily analytics needs more effectively.</p>
<h3>How long does migration from ThoughtSpot take?</h3>
<p>Migration typically takes 1-2 weeks including data connection, user provisioning, and basic training. This is significantly faster than the months required for ThoughtSpot implementations.</p>
<h3>What about our existing ThoughtSpot dashboards?</h3>
<p>While Scoop doesn't import ThoughtSpot dashboards directly, it connects to the same data sources. Users can ask questions to get the same insights without needing predefined dashboards.</p>
<h3>Is Scoop suitable for enterprise deployment?</h3>
<p>Absolutely. Scoop serves Fortune 500 companies with thousands of users, processing millions of queries monthly with enterprise-grade security and compliance.</p>
<h2>Conclusion: ThoughtSpot vs Scoop Analytics</h2>
<p>While ThoughtSpot remains a capable business intelligence platform, it represents the previous generation of analytics tools that require significant technical expertise and IT involvement. Scoop Analytics represents the future of business intelligence where any user can get answers instantly without technical knowledge or training.</p>
<p>The BUA Framework scores tell the story: ThoughtSpot at 57/100 versus Scoop at 82/100. This isn't just a incremental improvement - it's a fundamental shift in how organizations approach data analytics. Scoop eliminates the barriers that prevent business users from accessing insights, delivering true democratization of data.</p>
<p>For organizations seeking to empower business users, reduce IT overhead, and accelerate decision-making, Scoop Analytics provides a clear advantage over ThoughtSpot. The combination of natural language processing, collaboration tool integration, and true self-service capabilities makes Scoop the logical choice for modern data-driven organizations.</p>
</div>
<!-- END SEO-HIDDEN -->
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Organization","name":"Scoop Analytics","url":"https://www.scoopanalytics.com","logo":"https://www.scoopanalytics.com/logo.png","sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/company/scoop-analytics","https://twitter.com/scoopanalytics"]}</script>
<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"WebPage","name":"Scoop vs ThoughtSpot: Search vs Investigation Platform Comparison 2025","description":"ThoughtSpot's search-based architecture limits investigation depth vs Scoop's multi-pass AI analysis. See the $500K cost difference and Excel integration gap.","dateModified":"2025-10-01T04:10:52.277Z","about":[{"@type":"SoftwareApplication","name":"Scoop Analytics","applicationCategory":"BusinessApplication","aggregateRating":{"@type":"AggregateRating","ratingValue":"82","bestRating":"100","worstRating":"0","ratingExplanation":"Business User Autonomy (BUA) Score"}},{"@type":"SoftwareApplication","name":"ThoughtSpot","applicationCategory":"BusinessApplication","aggregateRating":{"@type":"AggregateRating","ratingValue":"57","bestRating":"100","worstRating":"0","ratingExplanation":"Business User Autonomy (BUA) Score"}}]}</script>
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com">
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin>
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Poppins:wght@300;400;500;600;700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
<style>
* { margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box; }
body { font-family: 'Poppins', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, sans-serif; color: #130417; line-height: 1.6; background: #ffffff; }
.hero--balanced { padding: 40px 20px; background: linear-gradient(180deg, #ffffff 0%, #f8f9fd 100%); }
.hero__container { max-width: 1200px; margin: 0 auto; display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1.2fr 0.8fr; gap: 80px; align-items: center; }
.hero__eyebrow { font-weight: 600; font-size: 14px; color: #4763F5; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 1px; margin-bottom: 16px; }
.hero__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 46px; line-height: 1.1; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 16px; }
.hero__subtitle { font-weight: 400; font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.5; color: #666666; margin-bottom: 24px; }
.hero__cta { display: flex; gap: 12px; flex-wrap: wrap; }
.btn--primary-balanced { font-weight: 500; font-size: 16px; padding: 14px 28px; background: #4763F5; color: #ffffff; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; display: inline-block; box-shadow: 0 2px 8px rgba(71,99,245,0.2); transition: all 0.2s ease; }
.btn--primary-balanced:hover { background: #3651D4; box-shadow: 0 4px 12px rgba(71,99,245,0.3); transform: translateY(-1px); }
.btn--secondary-balanced { font-weight: 500; font-size: 16px; padding: 14px 28px; background: #ffffff; color: #4763F5; text-decoration: none; border: 2px solid #4763F5; border-radius: 8px; display: inline-block; transition: all 0.2s ease; }
.btn--secondary-balanced:hover { background: #f8f9fd; }
.hero__bua-breakdown { background: #ffffff; border-radius: 12px; padding: 24px; box-shadow: 0 4px 16px rgba(0,0,0,0.08); min-width: 320px; }
.bua-breakdown__header { display: flex; justify-content: space-between; align-items: center; margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 16px; border-bottom: 2px solid #f0f0f0; }
.bua-breakdown__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 16px; color: #666666; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.5px; }
.bua-breakdown__total { display: flex; align-items: baseline; gap: 6px; }
.bua-breakdown__competitor { font-weight: 700; font-size: 32px; color: #E3165B; }
.bua-breakdown__vs { font-weight: 500; font-size: 16px; color: #999; }
.bua-breakdown__scoop { font-weight: 700; font-size: 32px; color: #4763F5; }
.bua-breakdown__max { font-weight: 500; font-size: 20px; color: #666; }
.bua-breakdown__dimensions { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 14px; margin-bottom: 16px; }
.bua-dimension { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 6px; }
.bua-dimension__label { font-weight: 600; font-size: 13px; color: #333; margin-bottom: 2px; }
.bua-dimension__bars { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 4px; }
.bua-dimension__bar-row { display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; }
.bua-dimension__bar { flex: 1; height: 16px; background: #f5f5f5; border-radius: 4px; overflow: hidden; }
.bua-dimension__fill { height: 100%; transition: width 0.3s ease; border-radius: 4px; }
.bua-dimension__fill--competitor { background: linear-gradient(90deg, #E3165B 0%, #ff4177 100%); }
.bua-dimension__fill--scoop { background: linear-gradient(90deg, #4763F5 0%, #5c7cff 100%); }
.bua-dimension__value--competitor { font-size: 11px; font-weight: 600; color: #E3165B; min-width: 36px; text-align: right; }
.bua-dimension__value--scoop { font-size: 11px; font-weight: 600; color: #4763F5; min-width: 36px; text-align: right; }
.bua-breakdown__legend { display: flex; gap: 16px; padding-top: 12px; border-top: 1px solid #f0f0f0; }
.bua-legend__item { display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 6px; }
.bua-legend__color { width: 12px; height: 12px; border-radius: 2px; }
.bua-legend__color--competitor { background: #E3165B; }
.bua-legend__color--scoop { background: #4763F5; }
.bua-legend__label { font-size: 12px; font-weight: 500; color: #666; }
.faq-section { padding: 60px 20px; background: #f8f9fd; }
.faq-section__container { max-width: 900px; margin: 0 auto; }
.faq-section__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 36px; text-align: center; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 12px; }
.faq-section__subtitle { font-weight: 400; font-size: 18px; text-align: center; color: #666666; margin-bottom: 40px; }
.faq-item { background: #ffffff; border-radius: 12px; padding: 28px; margin-bottom: 16px; box-shadow: 0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); transition: all 0.2s ease; }
.faq-item:hover { box-shadow: 0 4px 16px rgba(0,0,0,0.1); }
.faq-item__question { font-weight: 600; font-size: 18px; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 12px; line-height: 1.4; }
.faq-item__answer { font-weight: 400; font-size: 16px; color: #666666; line-height: 1.6; }
.toc-section { padding: 30px 20px; background: #ffffff; border-bottom: 1px solid #e5e5e5; }
.toc-section__container { max-width: 1200px; margin: 0 auto; }
.toc-section__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 18px; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 16px; }
.toc-section__nav { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr)); gap: 12px; }
.toc-section__link { display: block; padding: 12px 16px; background: #f8f9fd; border-radius: 8px; text-decoration: none; color: #4763F5; font-weight: 500; font-size: 15px; transition: all 0.2s ease; border: 1px solid transparent; }
.toc-section__link:hover { background: #ffffff; border-color: #4763F5; transform: translateX(4px); }
.feature-grid { padding: 40px 20px 30px; background: #ffffff; }
.feature-grid__container { max-width: 1200px; margin: 0 auto; }
.feature-grid__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 36px; text-align: center; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 12px; }
.feature-grid__intro { font-weight: 400; font-size: 18px; text-align: center; color: #666666; margin-bottom: 32px; max-width: 600px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; }
.feature-grid__items { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(320px, 1fr)); gap: 32px; }
.feature-item { background: #ffffff; border: 1px solid #e5e5e5; border-radius: 12px; padding: 28px; transition: all 0.3s ease; box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.04); }
.feature-item:hover { border-color: #4763F5; box-shadow: 0 8px 24px rgba(71,99,245,0.15); transform: translateY(-4px); }
.feature-item__icon { font-size: 48px; margin-bottom: 16px; }
.feature-item__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 20px; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 20px; }
.feature-item__comparison { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 16px; }
.feature-item__side { padding: 18px; border-radius: 8px; position: relative; }
.feature-item__side--competitor { background: linear-gradient(135deg, #fff5f8 0%, #fef8fa 100%); border-left: 4px solid #E3165B; box-shadow: inset 0 1px 3px rgba(227,22,91,0.05); }
.feature-item__side--scoop { background: linear-gradient(135deg, #f0f3ff 0%, #f8f9ff 100%); border-left: 4px solid #4763F5; box-shadow: inset 0 1px 3px rgba(71,99,245,0.08); }
.feature-item__value { font-weight: 700; font-size: 26px; margin-bottom: 6px; line-height: 1.2; }
.feature-item__side--competitor .feature-item__value { color: #E3165B; }
.feature-item__side--scoop .feature-item__value { color: #4763F5; }
.feature-item__detail { font-weight: 400; font-size: 14px; color: #666666; }
.content-section { padding: 32px 20px; background: #ffffff; }
.content-section--alt { background: #f8f9fd; }
.content-section__container { max-width: 1000px; margin: 0 auto; }
.content-section__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 36px; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 20px; }
.content-section__subsection { margin-bottom: 32px; }
.content-section__subtitle { font-weight: 600; font-size: 24px; color: #130417; margin-bottom: 12px; }
.content-section__heading { font-weight: 600; font-size: 18px; color: #130417; margin-top: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px; }
.content-section__paragraph { font-weight: 400; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.6; color: #333333; margin-bottom: 12px; }
.content-section__table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin: 24px 0; background: #ffffff; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden; box-shadow: 0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); }
.content-section__table th { background: #4763F5; color: #ffffff; font-weight: 600; font-size: 14px; text-align: left; padding: 16px; }
.content-section__table td { padding: 14px 16px; border-bottom: 1px solid #e5e5e5; font-size: 14px; }
.content-section__table tr:last-child td { border-bottom: none; }
.content-section__table tr:hover { background: #f8f9fd; }
.content-section__list { margin: 16px 0 16px 24px; }
.content-section__list li { margin-bottom: 12px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.6; color: #333333; }
.content-section__code { background: #f8f9fa; border-radius: 8px; padding: 20px; font-family: 'Courier New', monospace; font-size: 14px; color: #333333; margin: 16px 0; overflow-x: auto; }
.content-section__quote { border-left: 4px solid #4763F5; background: #f0f3ff; padding: 20px 24px; margin: 24px 0; border-radius: 4px; font-style: italic; color: #333333; }
.screenshot { margin: 60px 0; text-align: center; }
.screenshot img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; border-radius: 12px; box-shadow: 0 4px 24px rgba(0,0,0,0.12); transition: transform 0.3s ease; }
.screenshot img:hover { transform: scale(1.02); }
.screenshot__caption { margin-top: 16px; font-size: 14px; color: #666666; font-style: italic; line-height: 1.5; }
.hero__screenshot { margin-top: 40px; }
.hero__screenshot img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; border-radius: 12px; box-shadow: 0 8px 32px rgba(0,0,0,0.15); border: 1px solid #e5e5e5; }
.hero__screenshot__caption { margin-top: 12px; font-size: 13px; color: #666666; font-style: italic; text-align: center; }
.cta-section { padding: 100px 20px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #4763F5 0%, #3651D4 100%); text-align: center; color: #ffffff; }
.cta-section__title { font-weight: 600; font-size: 36px; margin-bottom: 16px; }
.cta-section__subtitle { font-weight: 400; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 32px; opacity: 0.9; }
.btn--white { font-weight: 500; font-size: 16px; padding: 14px 32px; background: #ffffff; color: #4763F5; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; display: inline-block; transition: all 0.2s ease; box-shadow: 0 4px 16px rgba(0,0,0,0.2); }
.btn--white:hover { transform: translateY(-2px); box-shadow: 0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.3); }
@media (max-width: 768px) {
.hero__container { grid-template-columns: 1fr; gap: 40px; }
.hero__title { font-size: 36px; }
.feature-grid__items { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }
.content-section__title { font-size: 28px; }
}
</style>
<section class="hero hero--balanced">
<div class="hero__container">
<div class="hero__content">
<div class="hero__eyebrow">Competitive Analysis</div>
<h1 class="hero__title">Scoop vs ThoughtSpot</h1>
<div class="hero__subtitle">
<strong>Choose Scoop if you need:</strong>
<ul style="margin-left: 20px; margin-top: 8px;">
<li>Root cause investigation ("Why did churn increase 40%?") with multi-pass analysis</li><li>Business users working independently without IT gatekeeping</li><li>Native Excel formulas (VLOOKUP, SUMIFS) with live data connections</li><li>Instant setup (30 seconds) vs 2-4 weeks of IT implementation</li><li>Fraction of traditional BI TCO (vs $140K-$500K annually)</li>
</ul>
<br>
<strong>Consider ThoughtSpot if:</strong>
<ul style="margin-left: 20px; margin-top: 8px;">
<li>Large enterprise with dedicated search team and $500K+ budget (rare edge case)</li><li>Already invested in semantic layer infrastructure with IT maintenance staff</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="hero__cta">
<a href="https://www.scoopanalytics.com/demo" class="btn--primary-balanced">Try Scoop Free</a>
<a href="#comparison" class="btn--secondary-balanced">See Full Comparison</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="hero__stats">
<div class="hero__bua-breakdown">
<div class="bua-breakdown__header">
<div class="bua-breakdown__title">BUA Score Breakdown</div>
<div class="bua-breakdown__total">
<span class="bua-breakdown__competitor">57</span>
<span class="bua-breakdown__vs">vs</span>
<span class="bua-breakdown__scoop">82</span>
<span class="bua-breakdown__max">/100</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bua-breakdown__dimensions">
<div class="bua-dimension">
<div class="bua-dimension__label">Autonomy</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bars">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--competitor">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--competitor" style="width: 55%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--competitor">11/20</span>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--scoop">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--scoop" style="width: 90%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--scoop">18/20</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension">
<div class="bua-dimension__label">Flow</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bars">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--competitor">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--competitor" style="width: 30%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--competitor">6/20</span>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--scoop">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--scoop" style="width: 90%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--scoop">18/20</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension">
<div class="bua-dimension__label">Understanding</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bars">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--competitor">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--competitor" style="width: 100%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--competitor">20/20</span>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--scoop">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--scoop" style="width: 90%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--scoop">18/20</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension">
<div class="bua-dimension__label">Presentation</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bars">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--competitor">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--competitor" style="width: 30%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--competitor">6/20</span>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--scoop">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--scoop" style="width: 80%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--scoop">16/20</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension">
<div class="bua-dimension__label">Data</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bars">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--competitor">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--competitor" style="width: 70%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--competitor">14/20</span>
</div>
<div class="bua-dimension__bar-row">
<div class="bua-dimension__bar bua-dimension__bar--scoop">
<div class="bua-dimension__fill bua-dimension__fill--scoop" style="width: 70%"></div>
</div>
<span class="bua-dimension__value--scoop">14/20</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="bua-breakdown__legend">
<div class="bua-legend__item">
<span class="bua-legend__color bua-legend__color--competitor"></span>
<span class="bua-legend__label">ThoughtSpot</span>
</div>
<div class="bua-legend__item">
<span class="bua-legend__color bua-legend__color--scoop"></span>
<span class="bua-legend__label">Scoop</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="feature-grid" id="comparison">
<div class="feature-grid__container">
<h2 class="feature-grid__title">Key Differences at a Glance</h2>
<p class="feature-grid__intro">Side-by-side comparison of critical capabilities</p>
<div class="feature-grid__items">
<div class="feature-item">
<div class="feature-item__icon" style="color: #4763F5;">
<i data-lucide="bar-chart-3"></i>
</div>
<h3 class="feature-item__title">Primary Interface</h3>
<div class="feature-item__comparison">
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--competitor">
<div class="feature-item__value">Search portal with exact terminology matching</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Search portal with exact terminology matching</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--scoop">
<div class="feature-item__value">Natural language chat</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Natural language chat (Slack, web)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item">
<div class="feature-item__icon" style="color: #4763F5;">
<i data-lucide="bar-chart-3"></i>
</div>
<h3 class="feature-item__title">Learning Curve</h3>
<div class="feature-item__comparison">
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--competitor">
<div class="feature-item__value">Search syntax + semantic layer training</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Search syntax + semantic layer training (2-4 weeks)</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--scoop">
<div class="feature-item__value">Conversational—like talking to analyst</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Conversational—like talking to analyst</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item">
<div class="feature-item__icon" style="color: #4763F5;">
<i data-lucide="bar-chart-3"></i>
</div>
<h3 class="feature-item__title">Simple "What" Questions</h3>
<div class="feature-item__comparison">
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--competitor">
<div class="feature-item__value">Works for basic searches</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Works for basic searches</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--scoop">
<div class="feature-item__value">All questions supported</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">All questions supported</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item">
<div class="feature-item__icon" style="color: #4763F5;">
<i data-lucide="bar-chart-3"></i>
</div>
<h3 class="feature-item__title">Complex "What" (Analytical Filtering)</h3>
<div class="feature-item__comparison">
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--competitor">
<div class="feature-item__value">Requires pre-built search models in semantic layer</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Requires pre-built search models in semantic layer</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--scoop">
<div class="feature-item__value">Automatic subqueries</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Automatic subqueries</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item">
<div class="feature-item__icon" style="color: #4763F5;">
<i data-lucide="bar-chart-3"></i>
</div>
<h3 class="feature-item__title">"Why" Investigation</h3>
<div class="feature-item__comparison">
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--competitor">
<div class="feature-item__value">Single query responses only, shows what changed not why</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Single query responses only, shows what changed not why</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--scoop">
<div class="feature-item__value">Multi-pass analysis</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">Multi-pass analysis (3-10 queries)</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item">
<div class="feature-item__icon" style="color: #4763F5;">
<i data-lucide="bar-chart-3"></i>
</div>
<h3 class="feature-item__title">Setup Time</h3>
<div class="feature-item__comparison">
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--competitor">
<div class="feature-item__value">2-4 weeks</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">2-4 weeks (semantic layer + IT configuration)</div>
</div>
<div class="feature-item__side feature-item__side--scoop">
<div class="feature-item__value">30 seconds</div>
<div class="feature-item__detail">30 seconds</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="content-section " id="1-executive-comparison">
<div class="content-section__container">
<h2 class="content-section__title">1. EXECUTIVE COMPARISON</h2>
<div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">TL;DR Verdict</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>What is Scoop?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">Scoop is an AI data analyst you chat with to get answers. Ask questions in natural language, and Scoop investigates your data like a human analyst—no dashboards to build, no query languages to learn.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Choose Scoop if you need:</strong></p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Root cause investigation ("Why did churn increase 40%?") with multi-pass analysis</li><li>Business users working independently without IT gatekeeping</li><li>Native Excel formulas (VLOOKUP, SUMIFS) with live data connections</li><li>Instant setup (30 seconds) vs 2-4 weeks of IT implementation</li><li>Fraction of traditional BI TCO (vs $140K-$500K annually)</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Consider ThoughtSpot if:</strong></p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Large enterprise with dedicated search team and $500K+ budget (rare edge case)</li><li>Already invested in semantic layer infrastructure with IT maintenance staff</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Bottom Line</strong>: ThoughtSpot is an enterprise search-based BI platform requiring semantic layer configuration, IT setup, and massive infrastructure (96 CPUs/600GB RAM), costing $140K-$500K annually with zero Excel formula support. Scoop is an AI data analyst with zero configuration, native Excel/Slack/PowerPoint integration, costing a fraction of traditional BI TCO.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">At-a-Glance Comparison</h3>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Dimension</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th><th>Advantage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>User Experience</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Primary Interface</td><td>Search portal with exact terminology matching</td><td>Natural language chat (Slack, web)</td><td>Ask vs Search</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Learning Curve</td><td>Search syntax + semantic layer training (2-4 weeks)</td><td>Conversational—like talking to analyst</td><td>Use existing communication skills</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Question Capabilities</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Simple "What" Questions</td><td>✅ Works for basic searches</td><td>✅ All questions supported</td><td>Equal capability</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Complex "What" (Analytical Filtering)</td><td>⚠️ Requires pre-built search models in semantic layer</td><td>✅ Automatic subqueries</td><td>No pre-work required</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>"Why" Investigation</td><td>❌ Single query responses only, shows what changed not why</td><td>✅ Multi-pass analysis (3-10 queries)</td><td>Investigation vs search</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Setup & Implementation</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Setup Time</td><td>2-4 weeks (semantic layer + IT configuration)</td><td>30 seconds</td><td>840x faster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Prerequisites</td><td>Semantic layer, data modeling, IT team</td><td>None</td><td>Immediate start</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data Modeling Required</td><td>Yes (Agentic Semantic Layer still requires configuration)</td><td>No</td><td>Zero IT work</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Training Required</td><td>Search syntax + terminology matching</td><td>Excel skills only</td><td>Use existing skills</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Time to First Insight</td><td>2-4 weeks</td><td>30 seconds</td><td>840x faster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Capabilities</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Investigation Depth</td><td>Single query (search paradigm)</td><td>Multi-pass (3-10 queries)</td><td>Root cause analysis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Excel Formula Support</td><td>0 functions ("Never learned VLOOKUP properly")</td><td>150+ native functions</td><td>Complete workflow gap</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ML & Pattern Discovery</td><td>SpotIQ predictions (black box)</td><td>J48, JRip, EM clustering (explainable)</td><td>Explainable vs black box</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Multi-Source Analysis</td><td>Yes (if in semantic layer)</td><td>Native support</td><td>No pre-modeling</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PowerPoint Generation</td><td>No (3+ hours manual work)</td><td>Automatic</td><td>18x faster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Accuracy & Reliability</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deterministic Results</td><td>Yes (search returns same results)</td><td>Yes (always identical)</td><td>Equal reliability</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Documented Accuracy</td><td>33.3% (Stanford HAI benchmark)</td><td>Higher validated accuracy</td><td>3x better</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Error Rate</td><td>66.7% query failure rate</td><td>Lower documented error rate</td><td>Significantly better</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cost (Typical Enterprise)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Year 1 Total Cost</td><td>$140K-$500K (licenses + infrastructure + implementation + training)</td><td>Fraction of traditional BI TCO</td><td>40-140x lower TCO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Implementat
ion Cost</td><td>$50K-$200K (semantic layer + IT setup)</td><td>$0 (30-second setup)</td><td>Complete elimination</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Training Cost</td><td>$25K-$75K (search syntax training)</td><td>$0 (Excel users)</td><td>Complete elimination</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Annual IT Maintenance</td><td>$50K-$150K (semantic layer updates)</td><td>$0 (no semantic layer)</td><td>Complete elimination</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hidden Costs</td><td>Infrastructure (96 CPUs/600GB RAM), consultants, productivity loss</td><td>None</td><td>Massive infrastructure savings</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Business Impact</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>User Adoption Rate</td><td>40-60% (requires search training)</td><td>95%+ (Excel familiarity)</td><td>2x better adoption</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IT Involvement Required</td><td>Ongoing (semantic layer maintenance)</td><td>Setup only</td><td>95% IT time savings</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Payback Period</td><td>12-18 months (high implementation cost)</td><td>3 hours</td><td>1,500x faster</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Key Evidence Summary</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot's Documented Limitations:</strong></p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Search Architecture Limits Investigation</strong>: "Change Analysis shows what changed, not why" - cannot do multi-pass investigation beyond single query responses</li><li><strong>Infrastructure Crashes Under Load</strong>: "$500k/yr for 20 people, then ThoughtSpot crashed with all our data" (Reddit customer)</li><li><strong>Zero Excel Integration</strong>: "Never learned how to do a VLOOKUP properly" (ThoughtSpot marketing) - complete workflow integration failure</li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Most Damaging Finding</strong>: Reddit customer paid $500K annually for 20 users before the system crashed with their data, requiring 96 CPUs and 600GB RAM for just 2-3TB.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Quick-Win Questions</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What is Scoop and how is it different from ThoughtSpot?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Scoop is an AI data analyst you interact with through chat, not a search tool you have to learn. Ask questions in natural language—"Why did churn increase?"—and Scoop investigates your data like a human analyst would, running multiple queries, testing hypotheses, and delivering insights with confidence scores. ThoughtSpot requires you to learn search syntax and exact terminology matching. Scoop requires you to ask questions.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can ThoughtSpot execute Excel formulas like VLOOKUP?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: No. ThoughtSpot marketing admits "Never learned how to do a VLOOKUP properly" and has zero Excel formula support. Scoop natively supports 150+ Excel functions including VLOOKUP, SUMIFS, INDEX/MATCH, and XLOOKUP.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: How long does ThoughtSpot implementation take?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: 2-4 weeks minimum with semantic layer configuration, data modeling, and IT training required. Scoop takes 30 seconds with no data modeling, training, or IT involvement required.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What does ThoughtSpot really cost?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: $140K-$500K annually including licenses ($50K-$200K) + implementation ($50K-$200K) + training ($25K-$75K) + infrastructure (96 CPUs/600GB RAM) + ongoing IT maintenance ($50K-$150K). One customer reported "$500k/yr for 20 people." Scoop eliminates implementation ($0), training ($0), and ongoing IT maintenance ($0)—typical customers see 40-140x lower total cost of ownership.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can business users use ThoughtSpot without IT help?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: No. Requires IT to configure semantic layer, set up search models, and maintain terminology. Business users need training on search syntax. Scoop is designed for business users with Excel skills—no IT gatekeeping.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Is ThoughtSpot accurate for business decisions?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: ThoughtSpot scored 33.3% accuracy in Stanford HAI benchmark (2 out of 3 queries fail). SpotIQ provides black box predictions without explanations of why patterns exist. Scoop provides deterministic results with explainable ML and higher validated accuracy metrics.</p></div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="content-section content-section--alt" id="2-capability-deep-dive">
<div class="content-section__container">
<h2 class="content-section__title">2. CAPABILITY DEEP DIVE</h2>
<div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">2.1 Investigation & Analysis Capabilities</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph">When you chat with Scoop and ask "Why did revenue drop?", Scoop investigates like a human analyst—running multiple queries, testing hypotheses, and delivering root cause analysis. ThoughtSpot performs single search queries that show what changed but cannot investigate why changes occurred.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Core Question</strong>: Can business users investigate "why" questions without IT help?</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Architecture Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Aspect</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Query Approach</td><td>Single-pass search (Google-like)</td><td>Multi-pass investigation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Questions Per Analysis</td><td>1 (search returns single result)</td><td>3-10 automated queries</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hypothesis Testing</td><td>No (shows correlations only)</td><td>Automatic (5-10 hypotheses)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Context Retention</td><td>No (each search is independent)</td><td>Full conversation context</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Root Cause Analysis</td><td>Limited (shows what changed)</td><td>Built-in with confidence scoring</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4 class="content-section__heading">The Question Hierarchy: Simple vs Complex "What" Questions</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Simple "What" Questions</strong> (both tools typically handle):</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>"Show me revenue by region"</li><li>"How many customers do we have?"</li><li>"What's the average deal size?"</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph">ThoughtSpot ✅ (good for basic searches) | Scoop ✅</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Complex "What" Questions</strong> (require analytical filtering):</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>"Show opportunities from top 5 sales reps by win rate"</li><li>"Display accounts where lifetime value > $100K and growth > 20%"</li><li>"Find regions where average deal size > $50K AND win rate > 60%"</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph">ThoughtSpot ❌ (requires pre-built search models in semantic layer - typically 1-2 weeks for IT to configure) | Scoop ✅ (automatic subquery generation)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>"Why" Questions</strong> (require investigation):</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>"Why did churn increase this quarter?"</li><li>"What caused the revenue drop in Q3?"</li><li>"Why are enterprise deals taking longer to close?"</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph">ThoughtSpot ❌ (search architecture generates single responses - cannot investigate beyond correlation detection) | Scoop ✅ (multi-pass investigation)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Key Insight</strong>: ThoughtSpot is a search platform—handles simple questions but cannot generate complex analytical logic on the fly or investigate beyond single queries. Scoop is an AI data analyst—handles all three question types.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">The Semantic Model Boundary</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph">ThoughtSpot's Agentic Semantic Layer Limitation:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Business users can only query data IT/analysts included in the semantic models</li><li>Complex questions like "show opportunities from top 5 reps by win rate" require custom semantic layer updates (typical time: 1-2 weeks)</li><li>If IT/analysts didn't include a table or relationship, business users cannot analyze it—even if data exists in source systems</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Examples That Require IT Work in ThoughtSpot</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Top N by calculated metric: "Top 5 reps by win rate"</li><li>Aggregation thresholds: "Accounts where LTV > $100K"</li><li>Multi-condition filtering: "Regions where avg deal size > $50K AND win rate > 60%"</li><li>Time comparisons with filtering: "Accounts where Q4 revenue grew > 20% vs Q3"</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop's Approach</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>No semantic model required—works directly on raw data</li><li>Complex analytical filtering automatic (subquery generation)</li><li>Business users not bounded by IT's model decisions</li><li>Time to answer complex question: 3 seconds (vs 1-2 weeks for IT to build)</li>
</ul><h4 class="content-section__heading">Side-by-Side Example: "Why did customer churn increase?"</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Response:</strong></p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>Search Results for "customer churn increase":
Customer Churn Rate by Month
- March 2024: 5.2%
- April 2024: 8.7% ↑
- May 2024: 9.1% ↑
Correlation Analysis:
- Support tickets increased 23%
- NPS scores decreased 1.2 points
- Login frequency down 15%
Change Analysis shows correlations but cannot investigate causation.
Requires separate searches for each hypothesis.</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Analysis</strong>: Shows what changed but stops at correlation detection—cannot investigate root causes.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop Response:</strong></p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>Investigation completed (7 hypotheses tested, 8 queries executed):
PRIMARY CAUSE IDENTIFIED: Contract renewals not followed up
- 47 enterprise accounts (>$50K/year) had contracts expire Q3
- Only 12 received renewal outreach calls
- 28 of 35 non-contacted accounts churned (80% churn rate)
- Revenue impact: $1.34M ARR lost
- Pattern: All accounts with contracts expiring 90-120 days ago
SECONDARY FACTOR: Support ticket response time
- Churned accounts: Average 4.2 days to first response
- Retained accounts: Average 1.1 days to first response
- Correlation strength: 0.73 (ML model confidence: 89%)
RECOMMENDATION: Immediate 90-day lookback renewal campaign
- Target: 23 remaining at-risk accounts
- Potential save: $920K ARR
- Required: Customer success manager + automated alerts
CONFIDENCE: 89% (based on 18 months historical data)</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Analysis</strong>: Scoop investigates root cause with specific numbers, identifies actionable pattern, and provides business recommendation.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Query Execution Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Query Type</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th><th>Advantage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Simple aggregation</td><td>2-5 sec</td><td>0.5-1 sec</td><td>2-5x faster</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Complex calculation</td><td>Requires semantic layer pre-work</td><td>2-3 sec</td><td>Eliminates pre-work</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Multi-table join</td><td>Depends on semantic layer setup</td><td>3-5 sec</td><td>No pre-configuration</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Investigation query</td><td>Cannot perform (single search only)</td><td>15-30 sec</td><td>Capability gap</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pattern discovery</td><td>SpotIQ black box predictions</td><td>10-20 sec</td><td>Explainable vs black box</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">2.2 Spreadsheet Engine & Data Preparation</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph">When you ask Scoop for data transformations, you describe what you need in plain language—Scoop generates Excel formulas automatically. ThoughtSpot requires you to export CSV files and rebuild calculations manually in Excel, losing live data connections.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Core Question</strong>: Can your team use skills they already have, or do they need to learn new languages?</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">The Spreadsheet Engine Advantage</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop's Unique Differentiator</strong>: Built-in spreadsheet engine with 150+ Excel functions</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">Unlike ThoughtSpot which has zero Excel formula support (their marketing admits "Never learned how to do a VLOOKUP properly"), Scoop is the <strong>only competitor with a full spreadsheet calculation engine</strong>. This isn't just about formula support—it's about having a radically more powerful, flexible, and easy-to-use data preparation system than search-based approaches.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Data Preparation Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Approach</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th><th>Advantage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Data Prep Method</strong></td><td>Search interface + manual CSV exports</td><td>Spreadsheet engine (150+ Excel functions)</td><td>Use skills you already have</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Formula Creation</strong></td><td>Cannot create formulas (export to Excel required)</td><td>AI-generated Excel formulas</td><td>Describe in plain language</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Learning Curve</strong></td><td>Search syntax training (weeks)</td><td>Zero (already know Excel)</td><td>Instant productivity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Flexibility</strong></td><td>Rigid semantic layer requirements</td><td>Spreadsheet flexibility</td><td>Adapt on the fly</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sophistication</strong></td><td>Limited to search aggregations</td><td>Enterprise-grade via familiar interface</td><td>Power without complexity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Who Can Do It</strong></td><td>Search specialists + Excel users (two-step process)</td><td>Any Excel user</td><td>100x more people</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4 class="content-section__heading">Skills Requirement Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Skill Required</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Excel Proficiency</td><td>Required for data export workflow</td><td>Basic (VLOOKUP, SUMIF level)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SQL Knowledge</td><td>No (search interface)</td><td>None—spreadsheet engine instead</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Search Syntax</td><td>Yes (exact terminology matching required)</td><td>None—just describe what you need</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data Modeling</td><td>Yes (semantic layer configuration)</td><td>None—spreadsheet flexibility</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Training Duration</td><td>2-4 weeks (search syntax + semantic layer)</td><td>Zero (use existing Excel skills)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Bottom Line</strong>: ThoughtSpot requires learning search syntax then exporting to Excel for calculations. Scoop leverages the Excel skills your team already has.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Data Preparation Example</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Business Need</strong>: Calculate customer lifetime value with recency weighting</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Approach</strong>:</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>1. Search for customer revenue data
2. Export CSV results
3. Open Excel manually
4. Build VLOOKUP and SUMIFS formulas manually
5. Lose live data connection
6. Repeat entire process for updates</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Who can write this</strong>: Excel users (after CSV export)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Learning curve</strong>: Search syntax training + manual Excel workflow</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop Approach</strong>:</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>// Ask Scoop to prepare the data with the formula you need
"Calculate customer lifetime value with 80% weight on last 12 months,
15% on prior year, 5% on earlier purchases"
// Scoop streams results through in-memory spreadsheet engine with formula:
=SUMIFS(orders[amount], orders[customer_id], A2, orders[date], ">="&TODAY()-365) * 0.8 +
SUMIFS(orders[amount], orders[customer_id], A2, orders[date], "<"&TODAY()-365) * 0.2
// Or build complex transformations yourself using full spreadsheet engine:
// VLOOKUP, INDEX/MATCH, SUMIFS, nested IFs, date functions, text parsing, etc.
// All 150+ Excel functions available for data preparation and transformation</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Who can do this</strong>: Any Excel user (millions of people)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Learning curve</strong>: Zero—already know Excel</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Technical Detail</strong>: Scoop has an in-memory spreadsheet calculation engine that processes data using Excel formulas—both for runtime query results and data preparation. You can also use the Google Sheets plugin to pull/refresh data from Scoop into spreadsheets.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Why Spreadsheet > Search for Data Prep</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Spreadsheet Engine Advantages</strong>:</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Familiar</strong>: Millions already know Excel formulas</li><li><strong>Flexible</strong>: No rigid schema requirements—adapt on the fly</li><li><strong>Visual</strong>: See intermediate calculations, debug easily</li><li><strong>Iterative</strong>: Refine formulas as you explore</li><li><strong>AI-Assisted</strong>: Describe what you need, Scoop generates the formula</li><li><strong>Sophisticated</strong>: 150+ functions enable enterprise-grade transformations</li><li><strong>Accessible</strong>: Business users don't wait for IT to configure search models</li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Search Disadvantages</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Zero formula support (must export to Excel)</li><li>Rigid semantic layer requirements</li><li>Search syntax learning curve (weeks of training)</li><li>Requires specialized configuration (IT bottleneck)</li><li>Lose live data connection with CSV exports</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Real-World Impact</strong>: A business analyst who knows VLOOKUP and SUMIFS can do in Scoop what would require search training, semantic layer configuration, and manual Excel exports in ThoughtSpot.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">2.3 ML & Pattern Discovery</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph">When you ask Scoop to find patterns in your data, Scoop runs real machine learning models and explains results in business language. ThoughtSpot's SpotIQ provides black box predictions without explanations of why patterns exist.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Core Question</strong>: Can users discover insights they didn't know to look for, explained in business language?</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Scoop's AI Data Scientist Architecture</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>The Three-Layer System</strong> (Unique to Scoop):</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Automatic Data Preparation</strong>: Cleaning, binning, feature engineering - all invisible to user</li><li><strong>Explainable ML Models</strong>: J48 decision trees, JRip rule mining, EM clustering</li><li><strong>AI Explanation Layer</strong>: Analyzes verbose model output, translates to business language</li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Why This Matters</strong>: ThoughtSpot has SpotIQ ML but provides black box predictions without explanations. Scoop does real data science work automatically, then explains it like a human analyst would.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">ML Capabilities Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>ML Capability</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th><th>Key Difference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Automatic Data Prep</td><td>Limited (search-based)</td><td>Cleaning, binning, feature engineering</td><td>Runs automatically</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Decision Trees</td><td>No (black box only)</td><td>J48 algorithm (multi-level)</td><td>Explainable, not black box</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rule Mining</td><td>No</td><td>JRip association rules</td><td>Pattern discovery</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clustering</td><td>No</td><td>EM clustering with explanation</td><td>Segment identification</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AI Explanation</td><td>Black box predictions</td><td>Interprets model output for business users</td><td>Critical differentiator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data Scientist Needed</td><td>No for SpotIQ, but can't explain</td><td>No - fully automated</td><td>Complete workflow</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4 class="content-section__heading">Example: AI Data Scientist in Action</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Business Question</strong>: "What factors predict customer churn?"</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Approach</strong>:</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>SpotIQ Analysis:
- Predicts churn probability: 73% likely to churn
- Identifies correlations: support tickets, login frequency
- Black box results: no explanation of why these factors matter
- Cannot see decision rules or confidence intervals
- Requires data scientist to interpret if explanation needed</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop's Three-Layer Process</strong>:</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Layer 1: Automatic Data Prep</strong> (Invisible to user)</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Cleaned 12,432 customer records</li><li>Binned continuous variables (tenure, usage, support metrics)</li><li>Handled missing values automatically</li><li>Created derived features (usage trends, engagement scores)</li><li>Normalized scales for model input</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Layer 2: J48 Decision Tree Execution</strong> (Raw model output - too verbose)</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>J48 Decision Tree (12 levels deep, 847 nodes):
Node 1: support_tickets
| <= 1: [Node 2]
| | tenure <= 6: [Node 3]
| | | last_login <= 7: LOW_RISK (n=1,234, 3% churn)
| | | last_login > 7: [Node 4]
| | | | feature_adoption <= 0.3: MED_RISK (n=445, 38% churn)
| | | | feature_adoption > 0.3: [Node 5]
| | | | nps_score <= 6: [Node 6]...
| | tenure > 6: [Node 15]
| | feature_adoption <= 0.5: [Node 16]...
| > 1 AND <= 3: [Node 89]
| | last_login <= 14: [Node 90]...
| > 3: [Node 234]
| | tenure <= 6: HIGH_RISK (n=342, 89% churn)
| | tenure > 6 AND <= 12: [Node 235]...
[... 835 more nodes with nested conditions ...]</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><em>This is explainable (not a black box) but far too complex for business users to parse</em></p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Layer 3: AI Explanation</strong> (What the user actually sees)</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>CHURN PREDICTION ANALYSIS
I analyzed 12,432 customers using decision tree modeling and found 3 clear risk profiles:
🔴 HIGH-RISK CUSTOMERS (342 customers, 89% churn rate):
Pattern: More than 3 support tickets + inactive for 30+ days + new customers (<6 months)
Why they churn: Early frustration without successful onboarding
Action: Immediate personal outreach + dedicated success manager
Expected impact: Can save 60-70% with intervention
🟡 MEDIUM-RISK CUSTOMERS (1,847 customers, 43% churn rate):
Pattern: Low contract value (<$5K) + low feature adoption (<30%) + neutral NPS (≤6)
Why they churn: Not seeing value, haven't adopted key features
Action: Training program + feature onboarding + check-in calls
Expected impact: Can reduce churn by 40-50%
🟢 LOW-RISK CUSTOMERS (2,156 customers, 3% churn rate):
Pattern: Long tenure (>24 months) + high adoption (>80%) + promoter NPS (≥8)
Why they stay: Embedded in workflows, getting value
Action: Upsell opportunity for premium features
Expected impact: 25-30% upsell conversion potential
KEY INSIGHT: Support ticket volume is the #1 predictor (45% of model influence).
Customers with >3 tickets churn at 8x the rate of those with ≤1 ticket.
VALIDATION: This model correctly predicts churn 91% of the time on historical data.</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>The Scoop Difference</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>ThoughtSpot</strong>: SpotIQ black box predictions without business explanations</li><li><strong>Scoop</strong>: Real data science (J48 trees) + AI explains it in business language</li><li><strong>Result</strong>: Business users get PhD-level analysis explained like a consultant would</li>
</ul><h4 class="content-section__heading">Example: ML_CLUSTER (Automatic Segmentation)</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Business Question</strong>: "How should we segment our customer base?"</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop's Three-Layer Process</strong>:</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Layer 1: Automatic Data Prep</strong> (Invisible to user)</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Normalized 47 customer behavior metrics</li><li>Handled different scales (login frequency, revenue, usage)</li><li>Removed correlated features automatically</li><li>Prepared for EM clustering algorithm</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Layer 2: EM Clustering Execution</strong> (Raw model output)</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>EM Clustering Results:
K=4 clusters optimal (BIC score: -34,521, AIC: -34,389)
Cluster 1 (n=1,607, 18%):
- login_freq: μ=6.8 σ=0.4 (daily)
- query_volume: μ=54.2 σ=12.1
- integration_count: μ=3.2 σ=0.8
- revenue_normalized: μ=2.8 σ=0.6 (high)
- retention_prob: 0.95
Cluster 2 (n=3,033, 34%):
- login_freq: μ=1.2 σ=0.3 (weekly)
- query_volume: μ=14.6 σ=5.2
- integration_count: μ=1.1 σ=0.4
- revenue_normalized: μ=1.2 σ=0.4 (medium)
- retention_prob: 0.72
[... statistical details for Clusters 3 & 4 ...]</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><em>Statistically valid but incomprehensible to business users</em></p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Layer 3: AI Explanation</strong> (What the user actually sees)</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION ANALYSIS
I discovered 4 natural customer segments in your base:
💎 POWER USERS (1,607 customers, 18% of base, 42% of revenue):
Behavior: Daily logins, 50+ queries/week, 3+ integrations
Value: $2.8M ARR, 95% retention rate
Strategy: Protect at all costs - introduce premium features
Risk: Losing even 5% = $140K revenue impact
⚡ STEADY USERS (3,033 customers, 34% of base, 28% of revenue):
Behavior: Weekly logins, 10-20 queries/week, 1 integration
Value: $1.9M ARR, 72% retention rate
Opportunity: Move 10% to Power Users = $190K ARR gain
Strategy: Training programs + feature adoption campaigns
⚠️ AT-RISK (4,281 customers, 48% of base, 30% of revenue):
Behavior: Monthly or less logins, <5 queries/month, no integrations
Value: $2.0M ARR, 45% retention rate (losing $900K/year)
Urgent: High churn probability
Strategy: 90-day re-engagement campaign or proactive sunset
RECOMMENDATION: Focus resources on protecting Power Users (highest value density)
and converting Steady Users (highest growth potential).</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Equivalent</strong>: No clustering capability—SpotIQ focuses on prediction, not customer segmentation with business explanations.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">2.4 Setup & Implementation</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Core Question</strong>: How long until users are productive?</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Implementation Timeline Comparison</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Implementation:</strong></p>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Week</th><th>Activity</th><th>Resource Requirement</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>1-2</td><td>Environment setup, data source configuration</td><td>2-3 IT engineers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3-4</td><td>Semantic layer modeling, relationship mapping</td><td>1-2 data engineers + 1 analyst</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5-6</td><td>Search syntax configuration, terminology setup</td><td>1 data engineer + business users</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7-8</td><td>User training, search optimization</td><td>Training team + all users</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>8 weeks minimum</strong></td><td><strong>3-5 FTE for 2 months</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop Implementation:</strong></p>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Time</th><th>Activity</th><th>Resource Requirement</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>0-30 sec</td><td>Sign up, connect data source</td><td>Self-service</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>30 sec - 5 min</td><td>Ask first business question, get answer</td><td>Business user only</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total</strong></td><td><strong>30 seconds</strong></td><td><strong>0 IT involvement</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Time Advantage</strong>: 840x faster</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Prerequisites Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Requirement</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Data Warehouse</td><td>Yes (must be pre-structured)</td><td>No (connects directly)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data Modeling</td><td>Semantic layer configuration required</td><td>None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Semantic Layer</td><td>Agentic Semantic Layer (still needs IT setup)</td><td>None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ETL Pipelines</td><td>Must be established for search optimization</td><td>None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Technical Team</td><td>Data engineers, IT administrators</td><td>None</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Training Program</td><td>2-4 weeks search syntax training</td><td>None (Excel skills)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4 class="content-section__heading">Real Customer Implementation Stories</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Implementation (from Reddit)</strong>:</p><blockquote class="content-section__quote">"$500k/yr for 20 people and it ended up crashing with all our data. We needed 96 CPUs and 600GB RAM just for 2-3TB of data. Setup took months with consultants."
- Company: Mid-size enterprise
- Timeline: 3-4 months actual time
- Challenges: Infrastructure crashes, consultant dependency, massive resource requirements</blockquote><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop Implementation (from customer case study)</strong>:</p><blockquote class="content-section__quote">"Signed up during lunch break, connected to Salesforce, got my first customer churn analysis in 30 seconds. Team was using it across all departments by end of week."
- Company: 200-person SaaS startup
- Timeline: 30 seconds to first insight
- Result: Company-wide adoption in 5 days</blockquote></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">2.5 Schema Evolution & Maintenance</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Core Question</strong>: What happens when your data structure changes?</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Why This Section Is Critical</strong>: Schema evolution is the <strong>100% competitor failure point</strong> and Scoop's most defensible moat. Every competitor breaks when data changes; Scoop adapts automatically.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">The Universal Competitor Weakness</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Data Change Scenario</th><th>ThoughtSpot Response</th><th>Scoop Response</th><th>Business Impact</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Column added to CRM</strong></td><td>Search models break, requires semantic layer update</td><td>Adapts instantly</td><td>Zero downtime</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Data type changes</strong></td><td>1-2 weeks to reconfigure search syntax</td><td>Automatic migration</td><td>No IT burden</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Column renamed</strong></td><td>Complete semantic model rebuild required</td><td>Recognizes automatically</td><td>Continuous operation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>New data source</strong></td><td>Weeks to integrate into semantic layer</td><td>Immediate availability</td><td>Same-day insights</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Historical data</strong></td><td>Often lost during semantic layer updates</td><td>Preserves complete history</td><td>No data loss</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maintenance burden</strong></td><td>15-20 hours per week for model updates</td><td>Zero maintenance</td><td>Frees IT resources</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4 class="content-section__heading">Real-World Example: CRM Column Addition</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scenario</strong>: Sales team adds "Deal_Risk_Level" custom field to Salesforce</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Experience</strong>:</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>Day 1: Field added in Salesforce
Day 1: ThoughtSpot search models don't see new field
Day 2: IT team notified, tickets created
Day 3-5: Update semantic layer configuration
Day 6-8: QA testing, search syntax validation
Day 9-10: Deploy to production, retrain users
Day 11: New field finally searchable</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Timeline</strong>: 10-14 days</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Cost</strong>: 16-20 IT hours ($3,200-$4,000 at $200/hr)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Business Impact</strong>: Sales can't search new field for 2 weeks</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop Experience</strong>:</p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>Day 1: Field added in Salesforce
Day 1: Scoop sees new field immediately
Day 1: Users can query: "Show me high-risk deals"</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Timeline</strong>: Instant</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Cost</strong>: $0</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Business Impact</strong>: Sales uses new field same day</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Schema Evolution Cost Analysis</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Annual Cost of Maintenance (200-user org)</strong>:</p>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Item</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th><th>Savings</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Data Engineer FTE for semantic layer maintenance</td><td>1-2 FTE ($180K-$360K)</td><td>0 FTE</td><td>$180K-$360K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Emergency schema fixes</td><td>15-20/year ($3K-$5K each)</td><td>0</td><td>$45K-$100K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Delayed feature adoption</td><td>1-2 weeks per change</td><td>Instant</td><td>Opportunity cost</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Annual Savings</strong></td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td><strong>$225K-$460K</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Typical 3-Year TCO Impact</strong>: $675K-$1.4M savings on maintenance alone</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Why Competitors Can't Fix This</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Architectural Limitation</strong>: ThoughtSpot uses semantic layers that are:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Pre-defined</strong>: Must specify schema upfront</li><li><strong>Static</strong>: Don't adapt to changes automatically</li><li><strong>Maintained manually</strong>: Requires human intervention</li><li><strong>Fragile</strong>: Break when data evolves</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop's Architectural Advantage</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Dynamic schema detection</strong>: Discovers structure automatically</li><li><strong>Continuous adaptation</strong>: Monitors for changes and adjusts</li><li><strong>Self-healing</strong>: No manual intervention required</li><li><strong>Resilient</strong>: Handles data evolution gracefully</li>
</ul><h4 class="content-section__heading">Business Impact Quantification</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>For IT/Data Teams</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Eliminate 15-20 hours/week of semantic layer maintenance</li><li>Redirect 1-2 FTEs to strategic projects</li><li>Reduce "search is broken" support tickets by 80%</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>For Business Users</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>New data available immediately (not weeks later)</li><li>No "waiting for IT to update the semantic layer" delays</li><li>Analysis keeps working as business evolves</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Strategic Advantage</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Adapt to market changes faster (no analytics lag)</li><li>IT team becomes strategic, not reactive</li><li>Business moves at business speed, not IT speed</li>
</ul></div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="content-section " id="3-cost-analysis">
<div class="content-section__container">
<h2 class="content-section__title">3. COST ANALYSIS</h2>
<div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Total Cost of Ownership Comparison</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Key Insight</strong>: Scoop's TCO advantage comes from eliminating 5 of 6 cost categories, not just cheaper software licenses.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Year 1 Cost Category Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Cost Component</th><th>ThoughtSpot</th><th>Scoop</th><th>Why Scoop Eliminates This</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Software Licenses</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Base platform</td><td>$50K-$200K (enterprise pricing)</td><td>Per-user subscription</td><td>Transparent pricing model</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Per-user licenses</td><td>$300-$2,000 per user annually</td><td>Included</td><td>Unlimited viewers included</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Premium features</td><td>All features require licenses</td><td>All included</td><td>No feature gating</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Implementation</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Professional services</td><td>$50K-$200K (semantic layer + consultants)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>30-second setup, no data modeling required (architectural)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data modeling</td><td>$25K-$75K (semantic layer configuration)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>Schema-agnostic design (architectural)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Integration setup</td><td>$15K-$50K (data sources + ETL)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>Native connectors, zero config (architectural)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Training</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Initial training</td><td>$25K-$75K (search syntax + semantic layer)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>Excel users already know how (capability)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Certification programs</td><td>$10K-$25K (ongoing search training)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>Conversational interface (capability)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ongoing training</td><td>$5K-$15K annually</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>No new versions to relearn (capability)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Infrastructure</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Compute resources</td><td>$20K-$60K (96 CPUs/600GB RAM requirement)</td><td>Included</td><td>Cloud-native architecture</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Storage</td><td>$10K-$30K (in-memory requirements)</td><td>Included</td><td>Managed service</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data warehouse</td><td>$15K-$50K (optimization for search)</td><td>Included</td><td>Serverless design</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Maintenance</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Semantic model updates</td><td>$50K-$150K (1-2 FTE annually)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>No semantic layer to maintain (architectural)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IT support (ongoing)</td><td>$30K-$100K (dedicated search admin)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>Business users work independently (capability)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Schema change management</td><td>$20K-$60K (15-20 hours per week)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>Adapts automatically to schema changes (architectural)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Hidden Costs</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>External consultants</td><td>$50K-$200K (implementation failures)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>No specialist dependency (capability)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Productivity loss during rollout</td><td>$75K-$150K (3-4 month rollout)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>Instant time-to-value (30 seconds)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Failed adoption / rework</td><td>$25K-$100K (search training failures)</td><td><strong>$0</strong></td><td>95%+ user adoption rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>YEAR 1 TOTAL</strong></td><td><strong>$400K-$1.2M</strong></td><td><strong>Software subscription only</strong></td><td><strong>Typical: 40-140x lower TCO</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4 class="content-section__heading">3-Year TCO Comparison</h4>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Year</th><th>ThoughtSpot (all categories)</th><th>Scoop (software only)</th><th>TCO Advantage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Year 1</td><td>$400K-$1.2M</td><td>Software subscription</td><td>40-140x lower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Year 2</td><td>$200K-$500K (licenses + maintenance + IT)</td><td>Software subscription</td><td>25-80x lower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Year 3</td><td>$200K-$500K</td><td>Software subscription</td><td>25-80x lower</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3-Year Total</strong></td><td><strong>$800K-$2.2M</strong></td><td><strong>Software × 3 years</strong></td><td><strong>Typical: 30-100x lower TCO</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="content-section__paragraph">Note: ThoughtSpot ongoing costs include license renewals, semantic layer maintenance, IT support, and infrastructure. Scoop costs = software subscription only (no additional categories).</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">Hidden Costs Breakdown</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot Hidden Costs</strong>:</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Infrastructure Crashes</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Description: System instability under load requiring hardware upgrades</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Estimated Cost: $50K-$200K (customer reported "crashed with all our data")</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Frequency: Recurring with data growth</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Source: Reddit customer reports, 96 CPU/600GB RAM requirements</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Semantic Layer Maintenance</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Description: 1-2 FTE dedicated to search model updates and schema changes</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Estimated Cost: $180K-$360K annually (data engineer salaries)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Frequency: Ongoing (15-20 hours per week)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Source: Multiple customer interviews on maintenance burden</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Search Training Failures</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Description: Users can't master search syntax, require ongoing support</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Estimated Cost: $25K-$100K (retraining, low adoption)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Frequency: Ongoing (new users, syntax changes)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Source: TrustRadius reviews on learning curve</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Consultant Dependency</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Description: Implementation failures requiring external expertise</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Estimated Cost: $50K-$200K (specialized search configuration)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Frequency: Implementation phase + troubleshooting</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Source: Customer reports of consultant requirements</p><ol class="c
ontent-section__list">
<li><strong>Productivity Loss During Implementation</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Description: 3-4 month rollout with team disruption</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Estimated Cost: $75K-$150K (team time + delayed insights)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Frequency: One-time (but affects Year 1 heavily)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Source: Standard enterprise implementation timelines</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Real Customer Example</strong>:</p><blockquote class="content-section__quote">"We spent $500k/yr for 20 people, then ThoughtSpot crashed with all our data. Had to bring in consultants to rebuild everything. Ended up costing way more than budgeted."
- Company: Mid-size enterprise
- Unexpected Cost: Infrastructure failure + consultant fees
- Source: Reddit customer post</blockquote><h4 class="content-section__heading">The Cost Elimination Framework</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Traditional BI platforms have 6 cost categories. Scoop has 1.</strong></p><pre class="content-section__code"><code>Traditional BI TCO = Licenses + Implementation + Training + Maintenance + Consultants + Productivity Loss
= 1x + 2-4x + 0.5-2x + 1-2x + 1-3x + 2-4x
= 7.5x - 16x the license cost
Scoop TCO = Software subscription only
= 1x (everything else is $0)</code></pre><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Why the 40-140x TCO advantage exists</strong>:</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>$0 Implementation</strong> (architectural): No semantic layer, 30-second setup</li><li><strong>$0 Training</strong> (capability): Excel users already know how to use it</li><li><strong>$0 Maintenance</strong> (architectural): No semantic layer to update</li><li><strong>$0 Consultants</strong> (capability): Business users work independently</li><li><strong>$0 Productivity Loss</strong> (capability): Instant time-to-value</li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>This advantage is defensible</strong> regardless of software pricing changes because it's based on architectural and capability differences, not pricing decisions.</p><h4 class="content-section__heading">ROI Comparison</h4><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>ThoughtSpot ROI Reality</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Year 1 Total Investment: $400K-$1.2M (all categories)</li><li>Time to First Value: 8-16 weeks</li><li>Adoption Rate: 40-60% (search syntax barriers)</li><li>Payback Period: 12-18 months</li><li>Common Issue: Implementation failures, infrastructure crashes</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop ROI Reality</strong>:</p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Year 1 Total Investment: Software subscription (no other categories)</li><li>Time to First Value: 30 seconds</li><li>Adoption Rate: 95%+ (Excel-familiar users)</li><li>Payback Period: 3 hours (documented case study)</li><li>Key Advantage: Zero risk of implementation failure or low adoption</li>
</ul></div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="content-section content-section--alt" id="4-use-cases-scenarios">
<div class="content-section__container">
<h2 class="content-section__title">4. USE CASES & SCENARIOS</h2>
<div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">When to Choose Scoop</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Scoop is the clear choice when you need</strong>:</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Business User Empowerment</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Users need answers without IT gatekeeping</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Excel skills are your team's strength</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Self-service analytics is the goal</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Fast Time-to-Value</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Need insights today, not in 8-16 weeks</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Cannot dedicate resources to semantic layer implementation</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Agile, experimental approach preferred</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Investigation & Root Cause Analysis</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- "Why" questions are more important than "what"</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Need to explore hypotheses dynamically</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Root cause analysis is critical</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Cost Efficiency</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Budget constraints limit options</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- High ROI expectations</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Cannot justify $400K-$1.2M investment</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Workflow Integration</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Work happens in Excel, Slack, PowerPoint</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Need analytics embedded in daily tools</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Native formula support is essential</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">When ThoughtSpot Might Fit</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Consider ThoughtSpot if</strong>:</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Large Enterprise with Search Infrastructure Budget</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Have $500K+ annual budget specifically for search platform</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Already invested in semantic layer infrastructure</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Note: Requires dedicated IT team for maintenance</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li><strong>Existing dbt/Snowflake Semantic Layers</strong></li>
</ol><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Can import existing semantic models (reduces implementation time)</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Have data engineers to maintain search configurations</p><p class="content-section__paragraph">- Note: Still requires ongoing IT maintenance</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Reality Check</strong>: 5-10% of companies find ThoughtSpot's strength areas actually apply to their needs.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Department-by-Department Fit</h3>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Department</th><th>ThoughtSpot Fit</th><th>Scoop Fit</th><th>Key Differentiator</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Finance</strong></td><td>Limited - Search not ideal for Excel-heavy workflows</td><td>Excellent - Spreadsheet engine for complex FP&A calculations, variance analysis</td><td>Excel skills at scale</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Sales</strong></td><td>Limited - Portal switching, no CRM integration</td><td>Excellent - Personal Decks for pipeline tracking, ML deal scoring, CRM writeback</td><td>Self-service + ML</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Customer Success</strong></td><td>Limited - No churn prediction, search only</td><td>Excellent - Churn prediction with ML_RELATIONSHIP, proactive risk identification</td><td>Predictive + actionable</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Data Teams</strong></td><td>Good - Search interface familiar to analysts</td><td>Excellent - Schema evolution eliminates maintenance, enables strategic work</td><td>Time savings</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Migration Considerations</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Migrating from ThoughtSpot to Scoop</strong>:</p>
<table class="content-section__table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Aspect</th><th>Complexity</th><th>Timeline</th><th>Notes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Data Migration</td><td>Low</td><td>1 day</td><td>Direct connection to same sources</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>User Training</td><td>Low</td><td>0 days</td><td>Excel skills transfer directly</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Report Recreation</td><td>Low</td><td>1-2 days</td><td>Investigation approach vs search recreation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Integration Updates</td><td>Low</td><td>1 day</td><td>Native tool integration vs portal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Change Management</td><td>Low</td><td>1 week</td><td>Easier tool = easier adoption</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Common Migration Path</strong>:</p><ol class="content-section__list">
<li>Pilot with one department (Week 1)</li><li>Expand to power users (Week 2-3)</li><li>Roll out company-wide (Week 4)</li><li>Deprecate ThoughtSpot (Month 2-3)</li>
</ol></div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="content-section " id="6-frequently-asked-questions">
<div class="content-section__container">
<h2 class="content-section__title">6. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS</h2>
<div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Implementation & Setup</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: How long does Scoop implementation really take?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: 30 seconds. Connect your data source and ask your first question. ThoughtSpot takes 8-16 weeks with semantic layer configuration, data modeling, and search training.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Do we need to build a semantic layer for Scoop?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: No. Scoop works directly on raw data with automatic schema detection. ThoughtSpot requires Agentic Semantic Layer configuration by IT teams.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What about ThoughtSpot - how long is their implementation?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: 2-4 weeks minimum documented, often 8-16 weeks in practice with semantic layer configuration and search training requirements.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Capabilities & Features</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can Scoop do search like ThoughtSpot?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Yes, plus investigation. Scoop handles simple searches instantly, then goes deeper with multi-pass investigation when you ask "why" questions.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Does Scoop support Excel formulas like ThoughtSpot?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Yes - 150+ native Excel functions including VLOOKUP, SUMIFS, INDEX/MATCH. ThoughtSpot has zero Excel formula support (they admit "Never learned how to do a VLOOKUP properly").</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can Scoop investigate "why" questions or just answer "what"?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Scoop specializes in investigation with 3-10 automated queries per analysis. ThoughtSpot is search-based (single query responses) - shows what changed but cannot investigate why.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can ThoughtSpot handle complex analytical questions like "show top performers by calculated metric"?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Requires pre-built search models in semantic layer. Questions like "show opportunities from top 5 sales reps by win rate" require IT to configure semantic layer updates (1-2 weeks). Scoop handles these automatically via subquery generation—no pre-work needed.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What ML algorithms does Scoop use?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: J48 decision trees, JRip rule mining, EM clustering—all with explainable outputs. ThoughtSpot has SpotIQ ML but provides black box predictions without business explanations.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Cost & ROI</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What's the real cost of ThoughtSpot for 200 users?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: $400K-$1.2M Year 1 including licenses ($50K-$200K) + implementation ($90K-$325K) + training ($40K-$115K) + infrastructure ($45K-$140K) + maintenance ($50K-$150K) + hidden costs ($125K-$260K). One customer reported "$500k/yr for 20 people."</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: How much does Scoop cost compared to ThoughtSpot?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Scoop costs a fraction of traditional BI TCO by eliminating 5 of 6 cost categories. Typical customers see 40-140x lower total cost of ownership.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What's the ROI timeline for Scoop?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Payback in 3 hours (documented). ThoughtSpot payback: 12-18 months due to high implementation costs.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Integration & Workflow</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can Scoop integrate with Salesforce?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Yes, native integration with bidirectional data flow and CRM writeback for ML scores. ThoughtSpot requires semantic layer configuration for CRM access.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Does Scoop work in Excel like ThoughtSpot?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Yes, with 150+ native Excel functions and live data refresh. ThoughtSpot has zero Excel integration - must export CSV files manually.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can we use Scoop in Slack?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Yes, native Slack bot with full investigation capabilities and Personal Decks. ThoughtSpot has one-way push notifications only.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Technical & Security</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Does Scoop meet our security/compliance requirements?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Enterprise-grade security with SOC 2 compliance, encryption at rest and in transit. ThoughtSpot excludes healthcare data (legal docs: "shall not upload PHI").</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: How does Scoop handle schema changes?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Automatic adaptation - new columns, data types, and sources are immediately available. ThoughtSpot requires semantic layer updates by IT (1-2 weeks per change).</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Framework & Scoring</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What is the BUA Score and what does it measure?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: BUA (Business User Autonomy) Score measures how independently non-technical business users can work across 5 dimensions: Autonomy (self-service without IT), Flow (working in existing tools), Understanding (deep insights without analysts), Presentation (professional output without designers), and Data (all data ops without engineers). It's positioned as Gartner's missing 5th analytics category—beyond traditional BI. Scoop scores 45/50, ThoughtSpot scores 57/100.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Why does ThoughtSpot score 57/100 when it's a Gartner Leader?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: ThoughtSpot optimizes for search capabilities and enterprise scalability (Gartner's Categories 1-4). BUA measures business user independence—a different architecture goal. Both are valid; the question is which your organization needs.</p></div><div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Decision-Making</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: When should we choose ThoughtSpot over Scoop?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Large enterprises with $500K+ budgets specifically wanting search interface and existing semantic layer infrastructure. Reality: applies to 5-10% of organizations.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: What if we're already invested in ThoughtSpot?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Sunk cost shouldn't drive future decisions. Compare ongoing ThoughtSpot TCO ($200K-$500K annually) vs Scoop migration value. Most customers find 30-100x TCO savings justify migration.</p><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Q: Can we try Scoop before committing?</strong></p><p class="content-section__paragraph">A: Yes, 30-second setup allows immediate trial with your actual data. See investigation capabilities vs search limitations firsthand.</p></div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="content-section content-section--alt" id="7-next-steps">
<div class="content-section__container">
<h2 class="content-section__title">7. NEXT STEPS</h2>
<div class="content-section__subsection"><h3 class="content-section__subtitle">Get Started with Scoop</h3><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Option 1: Self-Serve Trial</strong></p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Sign up: <a href="link" style="color: #4763F5; text-decoration: underline;">Scoop Trial</a></li><li>Connect your data source</li><li>Ask your first question</li><li>Time required: 30 seconds</li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Option 2: Guided Demo</strong></p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>See Scoop with your actual data</li><li>Compare side-by-side with ThoughtSpot search</li><li>Get migration roadmap</li><li>Schedule: <a href="link" style="color: #4763F5; text-decoration: underline;">Demo</a></li>
</ul><p class="content-section__paragraph"><strong>Option 3: Migration Assessment</strong></p><ul class="content-section__list">
<li>Free analysis of your ThoughtSpot usage</li><li>Custom migration plan</li><li>ROI calculation for your team</li><li>Request: <a href="link" style="color: #4763F5; text-decoration: underline;">Assessment</a></li>
</ul></div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="cta-section">
<div style="max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto;">
<h2 class="cta-section__title">Ready to see the difference?</h2>
<p class="cta-section__subtitle">See why teams choose Scoop over ThoughtSpot</p>
<a href="https://www.scoopanalytics.com/demo" class="btn--white">Start Free Trial</a>
</div>
</section>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/lucide@latest"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mermaid@10/dist/mermaid.min.js"></script>
<script>
lucide.createIcons();
mermaid.initialize({
startOnLoad: true,
theme: 'base',
themeVariables: {
primaryColor: '#4763F5',
primaryTextColor: '#130417',
primaryBorderColor: '#4763F5',
lineColor: '#4763F5',
secondaryColor: '#E3165B',
tertiaryColor: '#f8f9fd'
}
});
</script>
